Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op wo 04-05-2022 om 06:23 [+0200]: > Am Dienstag, dem 03.05.2022 um 23:11 +0200 schrieb Maxime Devos: > > Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op di 03-05-2022 om 22:04 [+0200]: > > > That's why I say the long-term goal is evaluating search paths over > > > multiple profiles. However, given that Guix Home is currently a > > > technological preview and given on top that multiple profile > > > support is "write your own shell script, will ya?", I think we can > > > leave that as a nice to have for later. > > > > In practice, ‘nice to have later’ becomes virtually never, see e.g. > > not building dependencies again and again and not having to build > > dozens of variants of a package (go-build-system (*) and cargo-build- > > system (**). As such, I'd rather have ‘now’. > In practice, this is still not a blocker, because extra inputs for > search paths affect neither the purity nor the union-build much.
... I did not say anything about purity or union-build here? Search paths are independent of union-build. Greetings, Maxime.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
