Hi Rovanion, Rovanion Luckey <rovanion.luc...@gmail.com> writes:
> I prefer names to not be lying about what they are, despite any > documentation. It is a UX problem if the user has to search the > documentation for any given package name before installing it, just to make > sure that it contains what it says on the can so to speak. > > The name glibc-utf8-locales when contrasted with glibc-locales reads to me > like "it contains only the utf8-locales". The package description reads as: This package provides a small sample of UTF-8 locales mostly useful in test environments. Perhaps it should simply be marked as a hidden package (not discoverable via the user interface), and not mentioned in the manual at all. What do you think? Thanks, Maxim
