On Thu, Sep 02 2021, Carlo Zancanaro wrote: > On Wed, Sep 01 2021, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: >> TL;DR: I'm generally in favor of branching emacs support >> packages off, even if origins are to be inherited. > > This is my preference, and there is precedent for this in Guix > already. I know of emacs-protobuf-mode and emacs-erlang which are > separate packages, but which reference the source of an existing > package (with (package-source protobuf) and (package-source > erlang), respectively). > > I like how easy it is to discover Emacs packages by looking for > the emacs- prefix. Mu and notmuch already violate that prefix > expectation, moving their elisp into a separate output would be > further hiding the Emacs modes. > > Carlo
Looks like there is consensus on the matter, unless someone objects, I will send an updated series that adds ‘emacs-notmuch’ instead of adding an extra output to ‘notmuch’. :-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
