Hi Leo, Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 04:47:06PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote: >> I just noticed that 'glib' is still grafted on the 'wip-ungrafting' >> branch. Was that intentional? >> >> https://git.sv.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/glib.scm?h=wip-ungrafting&id=e12210dc92098d8581cea3007d57dbb6be16bb41#n171 > > Yes. For that branch I only selected grafts that I judged to be > "simple". There are many other grafts still in place on that branch. Okay, thanks for the explanation. > My criteria for simplicity are grafts that either apply one or two > patches, or are minor version upgrades of projects that are known to > care about ABI compatibility. I don't understand why it's relevant how many patches are involved. It sounds like if I had concatenated all of the CVE-2021-27219 patches into a single file, you would have judged that as "simple", and therefore ungrafted it, although it makes no substantive difference. Anyway, it makes no difference to me; I'll continue doing my own thing on my private branch. I just wanted to make sure that it wasn't an oversight. Thanks, Mark
