Vagrant Cascadian writes: Hi!
> On 2021-02-13, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: [..] >> ...pretty familiar. So, what's going on here? Do the "woody" >> binaries not run on novena? > > My guess would be OABI (debian "arm" architecture) vs. EABI (debian > "armel" or "armhf" architectures). The hardware may likly support OABI, > but the kernel may need a compatibility layer enabled. > > https://wiki.debian.org/ArmPorts Ah, interesting. The kernel config has # CONFIG_OABI_COMPAT is not set ...certainly a lot easier to find when you know what you're looking for. @Danny: I'm wondering if we could (should?) try a kernel with OABI compatibility? I suppose it would be better to somehow target EABI...but I'm not sure that's possible with glibc-2.2.5 / gcc-2.95.3. Interesting choices here! Greetings, Janneke -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <jann...@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com
