> The armhf-linux platform is in the worst shape, both on the master and > staging branches. It's a shame because it's also the least powerful, > with almost no hardware thermally capable of sustained CPU usage, so > users will have the worst experience building packages for it. > > Does anyone want to work on it? Should we just "fix it on the master > branch?"
Your weather summary is a great idea, thanks! As I said in my previous email, the armhf substitutes are not built right now on the CI. It's really sad but we have to make an impossible choice between: * Trying to build everything on all architecture and have the CI that is awfully lagging behind. * Restrict the number of architecture we want to provide substitutes for. Thanks, Mathieu
