Hi! zimoun <zimon.touto...@gmail.com> skribis:
> What I wanted to illustrate is “revision” does not mean “new version“ > and I do not know what is the typical usage by people; aside Guix > dev. :-) > > How many times per week or month people are doing “guix pull && guix > upgrade” almost blindly without reviewing what is new? Good question. We should look at differences over time, not just differences compared to the previous revision, if you see what I mean. > Last, I was trying to understand what is the “revision” number > corresponding to which outputs. For example r-minimal: > > <https://data.guix.gnu.org/repository/1/branch/master/package/r-minimal/output-history> > > There are 3 outputs with 4.0.3, so I am expecting 3 similar revisions in > the chart. Then 3 others with 4.0.2, then 2 others with 4.0.1. > > In the 6 revisions in the chart, I was trying to figure out what does > mean the ’0’: r-minimal against which other one, i.e., which Guix commit > against which other one. Idem for 1,2,3,4,5. :-) In the chart I sent, probably the drop in r-minimal has to do with the version change. Thanks, Ludo’.
