Hi! Marius Bakke <mar...@gnu.org> skribis:
> Marius Bakke <mar...@gnu.org> skriver: > >> Now the question is: should we restore this patch, and in practice >> restart the branch almost from scratch? Or drop it, considering >> upstream has rejected it[0]? > > Following a discussion on IRC, we decided to reinstate the patch and get > rid of the newly added graft at the same time. > > Apologies to those who already started building it! Thanks for the heads-up, and apologies for making this mistake in the first place! As we speak, substitute availability is at 34% on x86_64-linux… Ludo’.
