Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> writes: > Following discussions on IRC, I’ve created a new ‘ungrafting’ branch > that does nothing but ungraft things. > > The rationale is that grafts incur additional overhead when installing > things (the time to create those grafts), so it’s good to clean them up > once in a while. Ungrafting in a dedicated branch means we know the > branch is “safe”, unlike more exploratory branches like ‘staging’ and > ‘core-updates’. > > The plan is to start building it later today, and to hopefully be done > in a week or so. > > Thoughts?
Sounds good. I'm not quite sure what you mean by safe though, it's definitely likely that things will behave the same, but it's not certain. Additionally, I guess there will be cases were things fail to build when the replacement is used in the build process. I thought the process used to be to push the update to staging/core-updates when the replacement was introduced to master?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
