Hi, Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> skribis:
> Pierre Neidhardt <m...@ambrevar.xyz> writes: > >> I'd like insist: in the current state of Geiser, we cannot leverage it >> reliably in Emacs-Guix. We need to talk to Guix directly, e.g. with >> `guix repl` like I've done in Nyxt. Geiser could/should start ‘guix repl’ instead of ‘guile’ as its entry point. > I don’t know. Geiser is pretty neat. I like that I can send anything > from a Guix source buffer to the REPL and invoke Guix commands on them. > This close interaction between the evaluated source and Guix actions > blurs the line between what is flexible code and what is the cold and > clunky shell environment. Using Geiser is a feature. > > Invoking mere shell snippets isn’t quite as interesting. +1 It was a conscious design choice to have tight integration via the Scheme APIs rather than by wrapping the command-line interface, and I think it’s worked well. The development features (info "(emacs-guix) Development") also obviously benefit from that. Thanks, Ludo’.
