Gábor Boskovits writes: > Hello, > > Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> ezt írta (időpont: 2020. szept. 16., Sze, > 15:25): >> >> Hi, >> >> Gábor Boskovits <boskov...@gmail.com> skribis: >> >> > I have two reasons for that: backwards compatibility is really >> > important, so we should not break it, and I believe this would not be >> > hard to do. >> > On the other hand it would be nice to have a more integrated backend, >> > and move as many things into the services infrastructure as practical, >> > and I think this is a good candidate for that. Wdyt? >> >> There’s already ‘setuid-program-service-type’. I think the way forward >> would be to: >> >> 1. Define the <setuid-program> record type you propose. >> >> 2. Have ‘setuid-program-service-type’ accept that through its >> extensions. When it receives something else, it should >> transparently turn it into a <setuid-program> record, for backward >> compatibility, and emit a deprecation warning. >> >> 3. Document the OS ‘setuid-programs’ field as taking a list of such >> records. >> >> How does that sound? > > Sounds good to me. I will have a look. > >> >> Thanks, >> Ludo’. > > Best regards, > g_bor
Hi! It's been a bit since progress has been made on this, and I wonder if I can help? Getting Postfix included in Guix is my last step before moving my main servers from Debian -> Guix so I'm feeling motivated. ;)
