Re: A better way to access records.

[Brendan Tildesley]

On 30/10/20 8:49 pm, Leo Prikler wrote:
Well, the "functional" way of accessing them all in one go would be to
   (map (cute <> foo) (list package-name package-version package-...))
But I assume you want syntax like
(let-field record field exp*)
(let-fields record (field1 field2...) exp*)
No I didn't want to specify the fields at all, just have all of them 
automatically defined.
analogous to (srfi srfi-9 gnu) set-field and set-fields, am I right?

Regards, Leo