Hello Tobias, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <m...@tobias.gr> writes:
> Maxim, > > Maxim Cournoyer 写道： >> I'd only agree to such a change if it's already been standardized in >> the >> RnRS as such > > Sure, I think that's implied. #true and #false are part of the > R7RS-small standard. Thanks, I couldn't find where that was defined. Now that you've pointed it to me, it's defined in section 6.3 Booleans: The standard boolean objects for true and false are written as #t and #f. Alternatively, they can be written #true and #false, respectively. > I don't know what Guile ‘is’, but it supports that part of the > standard. I don't think it implements any of the RnRS completely? > I've heard it said that Guile targets R5RS, but that was ages ago. info '(guile) Guile and Scheme' suggests it supports all of the R5RS, R6RS or R7RS standards, plus a bunch of srfi modules. With this cleared, I don't have an objection to the proposal, other than the other points I've mentioned earlier (to recall those points: I don't perceive much value in it and it'll make the 'git blame' output noisy). Thanks, Maxim
