Brett Gilio writes: [...] > > Also, are we planning to keep emacs-next and have it track 28.x or > remove it? > > Brett Gilio
I would like it if it's kept. Though, if it is truly meant to track the "next" release of Emacs, it should be pointed at the `emacs-27' branch, as there will likely be one or more point releases in the 27 series. On the other hand, as an Emacs developer, I would appreciate having a package that tracks `master' that I could use. Perhaps emacs-trunk would be a more appropriate name for that package. I know it's not typical for guix.git to contain package definitions that point to non-release commits; but perhaps Emacs could be an exception to that. Thoughts?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
