Hi Konrad, On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 at 11:26, Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hin...@fastmail.net> wrote:
> > Has the file 'guix-version-for-reproduction.txt' been tracked? > > Unfortunately not. The repository for the preparation of the post > is at > > https://github.com/khinsen/reproducibility-with-guix/ > > but it doesn't contain the file 'guix-version-for-reproduction.txt'. Argh! The author should watch the Fun MOOC about computational reproducibility. ;-) > > Is really the commit 769b96b62e8c09b078f73adc09fb860505920f8f used to > > produce the Docker image listed in the blog post? > > Hard to say... I can't play with that right now because I am running > jobs on my computer that eat all the memory. Leo reproduced the new observed hash. > One question I have been wondering about is the possibility of grafts > being an obstacle to reproducibility. Grafts are something I don't > really understand yet, so I cannot answer this question. In particular, > does a grafted package get a different hash from a package built with > grafting disabled? Grafts or maybe Guile 2 -> 3? Cheers, simon
