Jonathan, Guix,There's no way around this: zisofs is an old (2004-ish?) standard and it's limited to zlib. Calling XZ on the result as we do now is still worthwhile but not efficient.
Ludovic Courtès 写道：
I think the download size also matters, though to a lesser extent.
This is also my opinion.
It’d be ideal if we could have our cake and eat it too, but at any ratethe ISO size improvement is welcome!
Cake will be served once I (or someone else) get squashfs boot working reliably. We'll no longer *have* an ‘uncompressed’ ISO at that point, we'll boot directly from XZ.
But that first requires support for (real) unencrypted /boot. Kind regards, T G-R
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
