Howdy! guix-comm...@gnu.org skribis:
> commit 26973d51c37e6921454a4500fb95bcda11ea4ec8 > Author: Efraim Flashner <efr...@flashner.co.il> > AuthorDate: Fri Jan 31 16:28:23 2020 +0200 > > DRAFT gnu: bootstrap: Add support for the Hurd. [...] > @@ -378,18 +394,40 @@ or false to signal an error." > (rename-file guile guile-real) > (call-with-output-file guile > (lambda (p) > - (format p "\ > + (format p ,(if (equal? (or (%current-target-system) > + (%current-system)) > "i586-gnu") "\ > +#!~a > +export GUILE_SYSTEM_PATH=~a/share/guile/2.2 > +export GUILE_SYSTEM_COMPILED_PATH=~a/lib/guile/2.2/ccache > +exec -a \"~a0\" ~a \"~a@\"\n" > + "\ > #!~a > export GUILE_SYSTEM_PATH=~a/share/guile/2.0 > export GUILE_SYSTEM_COMPILED_PATH=~a/lib/guile/2.0/ccache > exec -a \"~a0\" ~a \"~a@\"\n" > + > +) > bash out out dollar guile-real dollar))) > (chmod guile #o555) > (chmod bin-dir #o555)))))) For the sake of reducing complexity and keeping supported systems as close to one another as possible, would it be an option to keep using 2.0 for GNU/Hurd, like on the other systems? That would entail changing make-bootstrap.scm to use 2.0 instead of 2.2 as a first step. And yeah, it’d also entail another full rebuild, which I’m sorry for, but I think this kind of simplification pays off quickly. WDYT? (I vaguely remember discussing it before but I forgot the outcome of the discussion. Apologies for that!) Thanks, Ludo’.
