On 2/22/20 1:34 PM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Have you tried building static gawk standalone and check it for that > bash? You could do something like > > grep -ao '/gnu/store/e*-bash' $(./pre-inst-env guix build -e '(@@ (gnu > packages make-bootstrap) %static-binaries)') > > On my x86_64-linux system, I get > > /gnu/store/eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee-bash Yes! I used the strings utility. I get two references to bash-static in the store with 'eeeee'. Speaking of which, do you know if it's possible to be spawned into an environment where %static-binaries's gawk package (and only that one) sources are extracted, patched and configured? So that I can investigate the inclusion of bash-static comfortably. > For the new Scheme-only bootstrap, I solved a similar problem for > %bootstrap-mes by replacing the /gnu/store/eee* store-references with > actual bootstrap file names; see `%bootstrap-mes-rewired' in > core-updates > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/commencement.scm?h=core-updates#n251 > I hear, however that smells like a hack to me, I'd like to avoid resorting to such unless absolutely necessary. How come it's not possible to find where that bash-static reference is being inserted?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
