Hi Ricardo, On Sun, 5 Jan 2020 at 21:38, Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> wrote:
> Gábor once suggested an iterative approach of identifying the most > important nodes in the package graph that should be moved to their own > modules, so that we would end up with a package graph that looks less > like a hair ball. I think it would useful to get a better view on the > relationships between modules. I am not sure to correctly understand. What does it mean "the most important nodes in the package graph"? Does "important node" mean a package which appears as inputs in a lot of other packages? Cheers, simon
