Jakob L. Kreuze writes: > Hi Dave, > > "Thompson, David" <dthomps...@worcester.edu> writes: > >> Agreed. Also this should be done in parallel eventually because >> updating 24 machines serially is silly. > > Good idea. Do we have a Guix-specific API for parallelism, or should I > look to the Guile manual section on Futures?
You can spawn a bunch of threads, then use Guile's channels to synchronize with the main thread. (Not to be confused with Guix's channels!)
