Hi Laura,
> Which lines? All of the changes I described were not necessarily ready >> for inclusion. They were all untested. >> > No, I meant I did it locally on my computer. I didn't even touched the > original file. Yes, I know. The lines I proposed were untested, though, and some of them required adjustment, so I was curious to know what exact changes you performed locally and where. > BTW, when they are finished how can I share that file > without pushing it? You can share a git formatted patch as an email attachment. >> This probably just means that there is no context permissions for “ls” >> to access /gnu. Another “allow” rule may be required to permit >> read-only access on /gnu to any process. >> > Oh, I see, but I still have the issue of not finding Guix. I will try to > create rules and share them here. When you run “which guix” what does it say? What does “readlink -f $(which guix)” say? -- Ricardo
