Hello, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> ezt írta (időpont: 2019. ápr. 30., K, 16:24):
> Chris Marusich <cmmarus...@gmail.com> skribis: > > > At first I was a little confused about why we would ever want to use a > > one-shot shepherd service instead of an activation snippet, but after > > reviewing the account-shepherd-service, I think I understand. It seems > > that we make it a one-shot shepherd service instead of an activation > > snippet so that we can take advantage of shepherd's service dependency > > management. In the case of account-shepherd-service, it looks like we > > made it a shepherd service to ensure that it would run after > > 'file-systems' is up. This makes sense, since it could be a little > > awkward to try to ensure proper execution order by extending the > > activation service, and even if we did that, it would duplicate the > > dependency management logic that shepherd gives us already. > > Yes, that’s exactly the reason. > > This raises the question, if we are willing to convert some more activation snippets to one-shot services. Are there any candidates for that? > The ‘user-homes’ service was introduced to fix a bug whereby, if you > were using a separate /home, home directories would be created at the > wrong time—i.e., before the real /home was mounted. > > Ludo’. > > Best regards, g_bor
