Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> writes: > Mathieu Lirzin <m...@gnu.org> writes:
[...] >> I guess that ‘guix weather’ checks the presence of substitutes for a >> current derivation of a package definition, so if in the same >> environment ‘guix weather’ tells that a substitute is available and >> ‘guix package’ doesn't fetch it, it sounds fishy no? > > Yes. I cannot see the derivation in question, though, so I don’t > understand why “guix weather” would claim that a substitute exists. > > I haven’t begun investigating this yet. I’m probably overlooking > something obvious. do you think I should file a bug report or should I wait for more investigation in this list? Thanks! Giovanni [...] -- Giovanni Biscuolo Xelera IT Infrastructures
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
