swedebugia <swedebu...@riseup.net> writes:
> I like the idea of keeping it simple and now we tried the lumped > modules approach. I don't like it so much to be honest. > > It comes with obvious drawbacks when the package per file grow and > subcategorization have to be done. > > But is it efficient in guile to load hundreds of modules where all > pull in more or less the same dependencies? > > If yes I think your idea is worthwhile Nils. > > We might have 3 repos: wip, core, extra […] This is a tangent. This thread is about removing obsolete packages. Let’s not discuss moving packages each to their own module here. This has been discussed elsewhere and it’s a can of worms (which is fine if you’re a bird, but not so good if you want to close the can again). If you’re interested in playing with this you can do this in a local branch and see how it behaves and what drawbacks it has. But I don’t think it’s a good use of our time discussing it (again). -- Ricardo
