On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 23:50:11 +0100 Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> wrote:
> swedebugia <swedebu...@riseup.net> writes: > > > "Björn Höfling" <bjoern.hoefl...@bjoernhoefling.de> skrev: (29 > > december 2018 12:53:04 CET) > >>On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 22:30:11 +0100 > >>Taylan Kammer <taylan.kam...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> I like dates in "rolling release" version strings because they > >>> immediately tell you how old/new the version is, but I can > >>> certainly live with that format too. Definitely better than what > >>> we have. > >> > >>I also would prefer a string containing the date. > >> > >>Björn > > > > +1. Maybe we could do both, first the date then the commits then > > the hash? > > Including a date would require more effort, because this format is not > supported by git, as far as I know. > > Support for the output of “git describe” would likely be much easier > to implement, but note that this might require missing features to be > implemented in guile-git. If that is easier to implement, sure. Björn
pgp9HxzYmL70m.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
