Pierre Neidhardt <m...@ambrevar.xyz> skribis: > go-ipfs is fine indeed, but that's because you've just looked at the lucky > package! go-ipfs vendors all the Go dependencies, which is why there is no > extra input there and go-ipfs closure size is optimal.
Oh, we should really work towards unbundling things from ‘go-ipfs’. Any idea how difficult that would be? > Now try with gx, demlo or syncthing: all of them had zero Go inputs in their > closure with go-1.9. Now they have hundreds with go-1.11 :( “guix size syncthing”, for instance, returns mostly tiny Go packages, which looks good to me, no? Anyway, if you think there’s a problem, could you email details to bug-g...@gnu.org so we keep track of it there? Thanks! Ludo’.
