On 2018-11-28 11:47, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Kei Kebreau <kkebr...@posteo.net> skribis:
snip


I agree with ng0 that Octave and its GUI interface should be kept in
separate packages, as the difference in size is more than 5000 MiB.
I also agree that the GUI package should be named "octave", but I don't
know whether the CLI package should be named "octave-minimal" or
"octave-cli".  I find myself leaning toward "octave-cli" because the CLI
package does include some non-essential dependencies.

Makes sense to me.  If others agree with this (“octave-cli” rather than
“octave-minimal”), go ahead!

I agree.

--
Cheers
Swedebugia

Reply via email to