Hi,
I've decided to withdraw my objections to the policy of requiring that
project participants agree to our CoC.
I read the language of the CoC again more carefully, looking to produce
a realistic scenario of a person with legitimate but unpopular political
views being discriminated against by this requirement. Ultimately, I
failed to find any realistic example that I wish to defend.
I no longer believe that agreeing to our CoC implies declaring agreement
with it. I think I jumped to conclusions too quickly here, partly based
on an unusually strong interpretation of the word "agree".
I've also been worrying about possible abuses that I now suspect (hope?)
would be unlikely to hold up in a court. For example, I worried that if
participation in the project is taken to imply agreement with our CoC,
that by a natural extrapolation, someone who contributes a single fix
but is otherwise uninvolved with the project could be legally held to be
bound by our CoC. That's thinking like a mathematician, where I should
have been trying to think like a lawyer.
So, I'm withdrawing my objections. Sorry for the stress.
Mark
