On Mon, Oct 29, 2018, at 7:46 PM, Alex Griffin wrote:
> It's not *just* a low standard of communication. The same sentence goes 
> on to list a whole slew of categories you might use to put people into 
> groups, which I don't agree with because it encourages treating people 
> as members of a group rather than as individuals.

I know someone will argue this, so I'll get ahead of it. This is probably a 
confusing statement, because the literal meaning of the words is that you 
should treat people as individuals. The problem is that if that's what you 
really want then it's a bad idea to remind people of all the ways they're 
divided.

-- 
Alex Griffin

Reply via email to