On Mon, Oct 29, 2018, at 7:46 PM, Alex Griffin wrote: > It's not *just* a low standard of communication. The same sentence goes > on to list a whole slew of categories you might use to put people into > groups, which I don't agree with because it encourages treating people > as members of a group rather than as individuals.
I know someone will argue this, so I'll get ahead of it. This is probably a confusing statement, because the literal meaning of the words is that you should treat people as individuals. The problem is that if that's what you really want then it's a bad idea to remind people of all the ways they're divided. -- Alex Griffin