On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 10:11:54AM +0200, Diego Nicola Barbato wrote: > Hello Guix, > > I have written a package definition for Inferno and I would like to know > if it would make sense to add it to Guix. I am asking because I am not > sure if it is compatible with the FSDG (bundled fonts, trademarks, ...) > and if it would be of any use to anyone. > > It builds reproducibly on my Laptop (x86_64-linux). I have not tried to > build it on any of the other (supposedly) supported architectures. > > For now the recipe has to be passed to `guix build' or `guix package' > using the `-f' option but I would be glad to add it to a module > (e.g. (gnu packages virtualization), or a module of its own) and send a > patch if it is decided that it belongs in Guix. > > Greetings, > > Diego >
Not a big fan of using the trivial build system for something that ends up with this many lines, but I built it on my aarch64 board and here's the diff I came up with to make it work. I didn't look into the source at all other than making it build. -- Efraim Flashner <efr...@flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
116a117,119
> ;; don't pass '-m32' unconditionally
> (substitute* "makemk.sh"
> (("-m32") ""))
126d128
< ;; TODO: verify this is not a problem on arm
129a132,133
> (substitute* "mkfiles/mkfile-Linux-arm"
> (("arm-gcc") "gcc"))
182a187
>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
