Hi, Clément Lassieur <clem...@lassieur.org> skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès <ludovic.cour...@inria.fr> writes: > >> Hello, >> >> Clément Lassieur <clem...@lassieur.org> skribis: [...] >>> Would it make sense to integrate it into Cuirass? We could browse >>> packages on Cuirass and to each package would be associated a link to >>> its build status on different architectures, etc. >>> >>> What do you think? >> >> Good question. Some sort of integration is desirable, with links as you >> mention. Now Cuirass is not specifically about packages, conceptually >> at least, so IMO having both features in the same tool would “break the >> abstraction.” > > Yes I agree. I wonder though: is there a way to know if a specific > derivation is a package? In general no. Of course one could play trick to try and guess whether it corresponds to a package, but that should be avoided IMO. Thanks, Ludo’.
