Hello Pierre, Pierre Neidhardt <m...@ambrevar.xyz> skribis:
> Wouldn't it make sense to move DrRacket to a separate output? I take > that most advanced users use something else (who said Emacs?) and > DrRacket might eat up a decent amount of disk space + extra dependencies > by itself. I don’t think it’s a matter of being an “advanced” user or not (DrRacket is really impressive, with a macro stepper and all sorts of bells and whistles), but I agree with the rationale. :-) > Arch Linux provides racket and racket-minimal: the latter is stripped > from DrRacket: > > https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?q=racket Such a split sounds good to me. What do Chris and other Racketeers think? Cheers, Ludo’.
