On Monday, 2018-09-10 14:27:02 CEST Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Sure! While you’re trying things out, you may find that IRC will be > better suited to get guidance and information on how to debug issues. OK, noted.
> Yes. In short you would define the new package to “inherit” from > ‘lua-5.1’, and you would change its ‘inputs’ field. There are examples > of that in the code. Let us know if anything’s unclear! I'll give it a try, I just wanted to know if there is maybe something more to it to be aware of. > We cannot #:select from (gnu packages …) modules due to the way Guile > handles circular dependencies among modules. However we could use > select more frequently for other modules. I didn't know about circular dependencies. I mainly wanted to know if there is maybe a reason or guideline against using `#:select` and whether package definitions like that might get rejected. > I don’t know if there’s anything similar for (Neo)Vim, but those of us > who use Emacs also use Geiser, which displays in the “mode line” at the > bottom the module that provides a given variable. That explains a lot. I know about Geiser, but Vim is the editor I have settled in, I feel that switching would be just as much work as porting Geiser to Neovim at this point. From what I understand Geiser has two parts: the Emacs plugin and the actual Geiser process which is written in Scheme. "Porting" Geiser would only require re-writing the editor interface for Neovim while the Scheme backend could be kept. It's just that no one has ever felt the need to do that, Lisp programmers who use Vim are very rare. Is there a way to get the module from a REPL? I can run a REPL in my editor, that's the crutch I have been using so far. (IMO tying the readability of the source code to the development environment is a bad idea, that's what IDEs always end up doing)
