Hi George, George Clemmer <myg...@gmail.com> skribis:
> ISTM we can improve this situation as follows: > > 1) agree on a canonical term to use for the 4 types of profiles I think you mentioned only two types of “profiles”: one is profiles created by ‘guix package’ or ‘guix environment’ or ‘guix system’ (they are all the same kind of “profile”), and the other one is execution profile, which has nothing to do with that. So to me it seems that “profile” is in fact used fairly consistently, isn’t it? However… > 3) add a top level discussion of profiles … we surely need this. Someone we should clearly define “profile” somewhere upfront. Perhaps we also need a glossary. Thoughts? Ludo’.
