Marius Bakke <mba...@fastmail.com> skribis: > I'm sorry, I forgot to address your actual concerns. The (buggy) > workaround was put in place and discussed in > <https://bugs.gnu.org/30761>. The meat of it can be found in (guix > build-system meson): > > ;; XXX PatchELF fails to build on armhf, so we skip > ;; the 'fix-runpath' phase there for now. It is used > ;; to avoid superfluous entries in RUNPATH as described > ;; in <https://bugs.gnu.org/28444#46>, so armhf may now > ;; have different runtime dependencies from other arches. > > Now, I'm not proud of this "workaround", but it's not exactly new, so I > don't see why we should rush to fix it now. Given how late we are in > this staging cycle, I would prefer delaying any proper fix until the > next round.
I agree. It’s terrible, but the priority here is to get ‘staging’ in shape for merging. Thanks for taking care of ‘staging’! Ludo’.
