2018-06-09 14:24 GMT+02:00 Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net>: > > Catonano <caton...@gmail.com> writes: > > >> Andy’s time is still limited. What other people can do is discuss > >> *specific* cases on guile-devel and work towards a solution. But please > >> do not demand of others to explain everything in detail. (I’m directing > >> this at everyone who heeds my advice to go to guile-devel, not at any > >> one person in particular.) In order to have a positive impact you also > >> need to learn enough about the state of the art to ensure that the > >> discussions can be productive. > >> > > > > I think I demonstrated I am ready to put some effort into this > > > > And I think this remark is unfair > > I wrote this: > > But please do not demand of others to explain everything in detail. > (I’m directing this at everyone who heeds my advice to go to > guile-devel, not at any one person in particular.) > > Rephrasing: I’d like to point this out to people who take this > opportunity to bemoan the lack of other features or who disagree with > what they think are different priorities. You do not feel addressed if > you know you’ve made efforts in this area. >
This is another of your points I can't process now I'll try again later > > > And saying I should come on guile-dev and actually provide what I thin is > > useful, nowing that I can't (not immediately is not a fair answer either > > > > Because it's equivalent to a "fuck you" > > Wow. No. > > I think that’s an *extremely* uncharitable reading of what I wrote. I > will refrain from further comments in this thread lest what I write will > be misconstrued in a similar fashion. > O, I'll try to clarify this one too. Just not now > > >> With regards to the shouting match on #guile that you linked in your > >> blog post, I can only say that I would have likely stepped in had this > >> happened when I was around. Textual communication certainly should not > >> reach these levels of apparent aggression. > >> > > > > What do you mean with "apparent" ? > > I’m pretty bad at gauging emotion in textual communication and it’s > generally not easy to infer the intended tone in short text messages. > That said, the exchange you linked to appeared to me to be of an > aggressive nature. That’s what I mean by “apparent”. > It was of an aggressive nature I was assaulted in an arbitrary, unwarranted and uncalled for way It was wild Because I had used G-golf as an example I had also used Skribilo as another example You now what Ludo did ? Instead of calling me an hopeless moron unwilling to learn, he went and updated Skribilo, without saying a single word I noticed And I appreciated it So, yes, it was aggressie indeed Again. I'll try to be more complete later
