Hello, Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> skribis:
> Yes, this can work. It’s hard for me to imagine where one would put > prose that resembles a tutorial in our current manual. It currently > leans very heavily towards a reference manual, which discourages me from > adding elaborate examples. > > There’s also the danger of interrupting the flow with too many big > inline examples. Currently, it is easy to understand the big picture > because the prose isn’t separated by step for step instructions. Yeah, I agree. > It would be sad to miss out on good tutorials just because they don’t > fit into the current manual; and it would be just as sad to clutter the > manual by filling it with tutorials that would seem out of place. Sure. So I think those tutorials that don’t fit in the manual should really have their own life, and that’d be great! Ludo’.
