Hello! Chris Marusich <cmmarus...@gmail.com> skribis:
> Tonton <ton...@riseup.net> writes: > >> Should we make the CoC more prominent or somehow inform about it >> better? For example by putting it or a link to it in the topic of the >> IRC channel, as it's own page on the website, if possible as part of >> the welcome message to the mailing lists, others? > > I think those are good ideas. I'd be curious to hear what Ludo and > Ricardo think. > > We mention the Code of Conduct in the manual (see: "(guix) > Contributing"). However, you're right that it seems we don't > prominently mention it on the website. Sure, perhaps we should mention it at the top of <https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/contribute/> and/or link to <https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/Contributing.html>? > While we wait for Ludo and Ricardo to reply, perhaps you could submit a > patch that implements the changes you're suggesting? That’d be great! >> A second question is, the contributor covenant has evolved, should we upgrade >> ours from 1.3.0 to the current >> [1.4.0](https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/code-of-conduct)? > > To help people understand what has changed going from 1.3.0 to 1.4, here > is a handy command you can use to get a visual diff of the versions: > > wdiff -n -w $'\033[30;41m' -x $'\033[0m' -y $'\033[30;42m' -z $'\033[0m' \ > <(curl > https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/1/3/0/code-of-conduct.txt) \ > <(curl > https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/code-of-conduct.txt) \ > | less -R As I see it, the new version is more clearly structured, clarifies the wording in some places, and introduces a distinction between “project team” and “project maintainers”. Perhaps we’d need to clarify what the “project team” is in our case (?). Apart from this, I think 1.4 follows the spirit of 1.3.0 and its clarifications are welcome, so I’d be in favor of “upgrading”. What do people think? Thanks for sharing your thoughts, Tonton! Ludo’.
