Nils Gillmann transcribed 1.9K bytes: > Nils Gillmann transcribed 1.4K bytes: > > Nils Gillmann transcribed 2.1K bytes: > > > Okay, here's what I learned: > > > > > > * except for source code, the modules itself in Guile aren't very > > > * detailed documented. The documentation is good, but... ... it's > > > * nowhere mentioned that you can have a module (foo bar baz) and > > > * possibly also (foo bar baz kim) but (foo baz bar bar) will lead to > > > * the error I described. > > > > > > So until I read into the core of Guile, I have 2 questions: > > > > > > 1. Is there a module name maximum length? -> So far I have encountered > > > very short module names in the wild, 3 the longest. > > > > > > 2. Is this really a module length problem? -> I have a functional set > > > of packages elsewhere, my non-core packages, named like (ports editors > > > foo foo) and so forth and they cause no problems. It's just weird to > > > me that the modules in ports and elsewhere work but in pkgs I can't > > > dissect the exact problem so far. I'm okay with any namespace, so > > > I'll simply remove the last element of the module names. > > > > > > I'd like to improve documentations or other relevant places if > > > what I experienced is some kind of corner case in module naming, > > > be it in Guix or Guile... or just to note what to avoid with > > > regards to modules. > > > > > > Actually the problem is not really module names I just found out. > > Here's what's happening now: > > I took my perl module which is in "pkgs/lang-perl/perl.scm", which contains > our basic perl packages, > and moved ( + renamed ) them into (core lang-perl perl) in a new directory. > > If I run GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH="/home/user/src/core" package -s mc I get results > for query "mc". > When I run GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH="/home/user/src/core" package --show=perl I get > the same message
Sorry, I was wrong (--show=perl works as expected). However having the same in the old structure with just this module (and the old name) does throw the old error. ccach of Guile is cleaned. > as initially pointed out in the opening post. > > > But I'm still curious about any possible guile module naming related limits > > and hints from people working longer with Guile. > > >
