Hi Jack, On Thu, 3 May 2018 16:23:12 -0400 (EDT) Jack Hill <jackh...@jackhill.us> wrote:
[...] > Me too. What I learned was from reading other package definitions. It > did seem to me that we would need to use git versions of some of the > dependencies rather than releases which slightly complicated things > for a first time packager. I also wasn't sure what to do about > supporting multiple CL implementations. I was planning to stick with > just SBCL to start. I took a look at your package definition and I wanted to let you know that I have a working package for cffi on sbcl locally. I'll try to get it submitted this weekend along with some changes to the asdf build system that I've been working on. > > I wonder if a quicklisp or similar CL package archive importer would > make sense and be useful. This is what I've wanted to write for a while but never got around to. Maybe I'll have a go at it again soon. Thanks, -- Andy
