Hartmut Goebel <h.goe...@crazy-compilers.com> writes: > Am 06.03.2018 um 18:03 schrieb Marius Bakke: >> Staging is nearly fully built, so it will have to wait until next round. >> Generally, branches 'close' once a Hydra evaluation starts. Check in >> here for progress: <https://hydra.gnu.org/jobset/gnu/staging>. > > This sound complicated for the occasional (staging-) contributor. > > How should I determine when the next round is about to start? I can't > even spot that "staging is nearly fully built" and hydra's web-front-end > is slow. Further I do not have the time for monitoring hydra and catch > the time-window then I can push my commit. For me this does not work out > - and I assume for others if doesn't, too.
There are typically discussions on guix-devel when we start the branch. Here is the previous correspondence: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2018-02/msg00406.html>. I suppose we can make it clearer when a branch becomes 'bugfix-only'. > Is there some queue-for-staging branch where I can commit this patch to? > Or some other means, like setting some bug-status? Feel free to push a 'staging-next' branch or something along those lines to Savannah. Then we can "promote" it once the current branch is merged.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
