2018-02-15 16:32 GMT+01:00 Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net>:

>
> Alex Vong <alexvong1...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> >> No, the script won’t install the SELinux policy.  It wouldn’t work on
> >> all systems, only on those where a suitable SELinux base policy is
> >> available.
> >>
> > So it won't work on Debian? I think Debian and Fedora uses different
> > base policy, right?
>
> I don’t know much about SELinux on Debian, I’m afraid.
>
> > If this is the case, should we also include an
> > apparmor profile?
>
> That’s unrelated, but sure, why not.
>
> I would suggest writing a minimal base policy.  SELinux is not an
> all-or-nothing affair.  That base policy only needs to provide the few
> types that we care about for the guix-daemon.  It wouldn’t be too hard.
>
> The resulting policy could then be used on GuixSD or any other system
> that doesn’t have a full SELinux configuration.
>
>
I would be interested in doing that. It would be great if we could use
SELinux on GuixSD. I also like the apparmor idea. These would be
great enablers for me. Do we have any policy how we do these, or
should I check how it is done on other distros?


> > Which paths does guix-daemon need to have r/w access
> > to? From your SELinux profile, we know the following is needed:
> >
> >   @guix_sysconfdir@/guix(/.*)?
> >   @guix_localstatedir@/guix(/.*)?
> >   @guix_localstatedir@/guix/profiles(/.*)?
> >   /gnu
> >   @storedir@(/.+)?
> >   @storedir@/[^/]+/.+
> >   @prefix@/bin/guix-daemon
> >   @storedir@/.+-(guix-.+|profile)/bin/guix-daemon
> >   @storedir@/.+-(guix-.+|profile)/libexec/guix-authenticate
> >   @storedir@/.+-(guix-.+|profile)/libexec/guix/(.*)?
> >   @guix_localstatedir@/guix/daemon-socket/socket
>
> These are not things that the daemon needs to have access to.  These are
> paths that are to be labeled.  The daemon is executed in a certain
> context, and processes in that context may have certain permissions on
> some of the files that have been labeled.
>
> --
> Ricardo
>
> GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6  2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
> https://elephly.net
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to