Hi, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <m...@tobias.gr> skribis:
> Leo Famulari wrote on 21/01/18 at 23:37: >> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 04:47:14PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: >>> Danny, >>> >>> Danny Milosavljevic wrote on 20/01/18 at 11:40: >>>> We should change that in core-updates-next, if possible. >>>> >>>> I think that native-inputs shouldn't end up in the final binary as a >>>> reference [...] >>> This has been discussed before, and I agree. (I started a branch to do >>> so but it breaks quite a few things and it got tedious. I think I'm >>> ready for more now.) > > [...] > >> I'd rather we do it somewhere else than core-updates. >> >> It's already very difficult to complete the core-updates cycles. We >> should limit core-updates to updates of core packages, and handle big >> changes to Guix itself on their own branches. > > Er, yeah. Definitely. +1 Anyway, I think it’s worth experimenting this on a branch. We’ll have to expect lots of breakage as Leo writes, so we’ll need to refine things progressively. Once such a branch exist, we can get it built on berlin or hydra. Ludo’.
