Ok I've built ant 1.9.9 with ant/java8 and icedtea8. It is ok. 2017-12-10 16:56 GMT+01:00 Gábor Boskovits <boskov...@gmail.com>:
> I've seen package: > java-jgit-4.2 explicitly depending on icedtea-7 > other explicit dependencies are for: > icedtea-7 > ant > > These are ok, I believe. > > We have ant/java8. > > What is the current status of these two: > ant vs ant/java8, is ant/java8 the default? > Should we do something with these? > > > > 2017-12-08 8:01 GMT+01:00 Gábor Boskovits <boskov...@gmail.com>: > >> Ok, hopefully that will work out. However there was a hint yesterday, >> that newest core-updates is broken again after a recent merge... >> It might worth to have a look around to see if it's woth to do on an >> older revision... >> >> I will wait for your results for now... >> >> Maybe later this weekend I can start up a few vm-s with guixsd, and have >> those involved in rebuilding if needed... >> >> 2017-12-08 7:55 GMT+01:00 Chris Marusich <cmmarus...@gmail.com>: >> >>> Gábor Boskovits <boskov...@gmail.com> writes: >>> >>> > sra-tools2.8.2-1 builds with no problem. >>> >>> Now that things are hopefully fixed up a bit more in core-updates I am >>> trying again to build the "covering" of icedtea to see what still needs >>> to be fixed. I'll let you know how that goes. >>> >>> -- >>> Chris >>> >> >> >
