ng0 <n...@n0.is> skribis: > Ludovic Courtès transcribed 2.6K bytes:
[...] >> However, disk images are likely not bit-reproducible currently, >> primarily due to non-determinism in how file systems populate the disk. >> >> They might be reproducible if ‘guix system’ always creates files in the >> same order, which is something we could enforce (perhaps that’s already >> the case). If it’s not sufficient, then we should look at what others >> in the reproducible-builds.org effort have been doing (Tails achieved >> reproducible ISO images, for instance, and I think OpenWrt people were >> looking at ext2 reproducibility.) >> >> There may also be lingering non-reproducibility issues in some of the >> packages included that need to be addressed. >> >> It would be good to investigate! > > Definitely, I agree. Should we open a new bug ticket to track this effort? Sure, two even: one for the binary tarball, one for the GuixSD ISO image. Ludo’.
