Any news on this icu4c thing?
We had a problem on core-updates,
reverting ee3ebf1a357bd4eb36a2fa1790a7b549cffb305a makes it usable, it is
not the best thing we can do, but in case you meet with encoding related
errors after rebase this is a quick fix.
I will have a look at this java-testng failure in the meanwhile. I'll
report back if I find something.
2017-12-02 8:06 GMT+01:00 Chris Marusich <cmmarus...@gmail.com>:
> Gábor Boskovits <boskov...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Hello!
> >
> > I've just checked the current build status of packages on hyrda. I could
> > filter out a few that currently seems not to build anyway, we might try
> to
> > fix those first.
> >
> > I'll send a quick list:
> >
> > *java-htsjdk@1.129 -> newer version (2.3.0) in master, does not build;
> > java-testng@6.12
> > *java-plexus-container-default@1.7.1 -> does not build; java-testng@6.12
> > *kodi@18.0_alpha-6-f22d62d -> does not build; unbound 1.6.7
> > *java-eclipse-jetty-servlet@9.4.6 -> does not build;
> > java-eclipse-jetty-security-9.2.22
> > *java-eclipse-jetty-servlet@9.2.22 -> does not build;
> > java-eclipse-jetty-security-9.4.6
> >
> > The first one with the specific version does build, to be clear, but the
> > newer version does not.
> > I've extracted the log segment of those failures:
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------------------------------
> > java-testng@6.12 - log extract:
> > TestNG
> > Total tests run: 1517, Failures: 1, Skips: 0
> > ===============================================
> >
> > Failures in <suite> :TestNG, <test> :Parallelization
> > test.thread.parallelization.ParallelByMethodsTestCase4Scenario1.
> verifyThatTestMethodsRunInParallelThreads()
> > StackTrace:
> > java.lang.AssertionError: Expected 6 test method start event logs to be
> in
> > a block of methods executing in parallel. Found an event log of a
> different
> > type in the block being processed: [EventLog{Event:
> > LISTENER_TEST_METHOD_START, Suite: TestSuiteC, Test:
> > TestSuiteC-FourTestClassTest, Class:
> > test.thread.parallelization.sample.TestClassBSixMethodsWithDataPr
> oviderOnAllMethodsAndNoDepsSample,
> > Class instance hash code: 2118912967, Method name: testMethodB, Time of
> > event: 1511159025654, Thread ID: 5556}, EventLog{Event:
> > TEST_METHOD_EXECUTION, Suite: TestSuiteC, Test:
> > TestSuiteC-FourTestClassTest, Class:
> > test.thread.parallelization.sample.TestClassBSixMethodsWithDataPr
> oviderOnAllMethodsAndNoDepsSample,
> > Class instance hash code: 2118912967, Method name: testMethodB, Data
> > provider param: paramThree, Time of event: 1511159026154, Thread ID:
> 5556},
> > EventLog{Event: LISTENER_TEST_METHOD_START, Suite: TestSuiteC, Test:
> > TestSuiteC-FourTestClassTest, Class:
> > test.thread.parallelization.sample.TestClassBSixMethodsWithDataPr
> oviderOnAllMethodsAndNoDepsSample,
> > Class instance hash code: 2118912967, Method name: testMethodA, Time of
> > event: 1511159026244, Thread ID: 5550}, EventLog{Event:
> > LISTENER_TEST_METHOD_START, Suite: TestSuiteC, Test:
> > TestSuiteC-FourTestClassTest, Class:
> > test.thread.parallelization.sample.TestClassBSixMethodsWithDataPr
> oviderOnAllMethodsAndNoDepsSample,
> > Class instance hash code: 2118912967, Method name: testMethodF, Time of
> > event: 1511159026244, Thread ID: 5560}, EventLog{Event:
> > LISTENER_TEST_METHOD_START, Suite: TestSuiteC, Test:
> > TestSuiteC-FourTestClassTest, Class:
> > test.thread.parallelization.sample.TestClassBSixMethodsWithDataPr
> oviderOnAllMethodsAndNoDepsSample,
> > Class instance hash code: 2118912967, Method name: testMethodC, Time of
> > event: 1511159026244, Thread ID: 5552}, EventLog{Event:
> > LISTENER_TEST_METHOD_START, Suite: TestSuiteC, Test:
> > TestSuiteC-FourTestClassTest, Class:
> > test.thread.parallelization.sample.TestClassBSixMethodsWithDataPr
> oviderOnAllMethodsAndNoDepsSample,
> > Class instance hash code: 2118912967, Method name: testMethodE, Time of
> > event: 1511159026244, Thread ID: 5558}] expected [true] but found [false]
> > at
> > test.thread.parallelization.BaseParallelizationTest.
> verifyEventTypeForEventsLogs(Unknown
> > Source)
> > at
> > test.thread.parallelization.BaseParallelizationTest.
> verifySimultaneousTestMethodListenerStartEvents(Unknown
> > Source)
> > at
> > test.thread.parallelization.BaseParallelizationTest.
> verifySimultaneousTestMethodListenerStartEvents(Unknown
> > Source)
> > at
> > test.thread.parallelization.BaseParallelizationTest.
> verifyParallelTestMethodsWithNonParallelDataProvider(Unknown
> > Source)
> > at
> > test.thread.parallelization.ParallelByMethodsTestCase4Scenario1.
> verifyThatTestMethodsRunInParallelThreads(Unknown
> > Source)
> > ... Removed 27 stack frames
> >
> > phase `check' failed after 282.9 seconds
> >
> > Requires further investigation.
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------------------------------------
> >
> > unbound@1.6.7 - log extract
> > libtool: link: gcc -I.
> > -I/gnu/store/ks27x0mf95gir0cdgb9h573xbava6v1k-python-3.5.3/include/
> python3.5m
> > -I/gnu/store/m0m6bwzi8lx7kv8zbn3hjrim6flmgnf4-openssl-1.0.2l/include
> > -I/gnu/store/ldkwm8hwhknpx6651yjgc1231nh8234d-libevent-2.1.8/include
> > -I/gnu/store/wdlhrg370gm42s7ggyhnvnb4xrzpls1x-expat-2.2.1/include -g -O2
> > -flto -pthread -o testbound .libs/testbound.o .libs/replay.o
> > .libs/fake_event.o .libs/testpkts.o .libs/worker.o .libs/acl_list.o
> > .libs/daemon.o .libs/stats.o .libs/shm_main.o .libs/dns.o .libs/infra.o
> > .libs/rrset.o .libs/dname.o .libs/msgencode.o .libs/as112.o
> > .libs/msgparse.o .libs/msgreply.o .libs/packed_rrset.o .libs/iterator.o
> > .libs/iter_delegpt.o .libs/iter_donotq.o .libs/iter_fwd.o
> > .libs/iter_hints.o .libs/iter_priv.o .libs/iter_resptype.o
> > .libs/iter_scrub.o .libs/iter_utils.o .libs/localzone.o .libs/mesh.o
> > .libs/modstack.o .libs/view.o .libs/outbound_list.o .libs/alloc.o
> > .libs/config_file.o .libs/configlexer.o .libs/configparser.o
> > .libs/fptr_wlist.o .libs/locks.o .libs/log.o .libs/mini_event.o
> > .libs/module.o .libs/net_help.o .libs/random.o .libs/rbtree.o
> > .libs/regional.o .libs/rtt.o .libs/dnstree.o .libs/lookup3.o
> > .libs/lruhash.o .libs/slabhash.o .libs/timehist.o .libs/tube.o
> > .libs/winsock_event.o .libs/autotrust.o .libs/val_anchor.o
> > .libs/validator.o .libs/val_kcache.o .libs/val_kentry.o .libs/val_neg.o
> > .libs/val_nsec3.o .libs/val_nsec.o .libs/val_secalgo.o
> .libs/val_sigcrypt.o
> > .libs/val_utils.o .libs/dns64.o .libs/cachedb.o .libs/authzone.o
> > .libs/pythonmod.o .libs/pythonmod_utils.o .libs/respip.o .libs/ub_event.o
> > .libs/keyraw.o .libs/sbuffer.o .libs/wire2str.o .libs/parse.o
> > .libs/parseutil.o .libs/rrdef.o .libs/str2wire.o .libs/strlcat.o
> > .libs/strlcpy.o .libs/reallocarray.o .libs/arc4random.o
> > .libs/arc4random_uniform.o .libs/explicit_bzero.o .libs/arc4_lock.o
> > -L/gnu/store/m0m6bwzi8lx7kv8zbn3hjrim6flmgnf4-openssl-1.0.2l/lib
> > -L/gnu/store/ldkwm8hwhknpx6651yjgc1231nh8234d-libevent-2.1.8/lib
> > -L/gnu/store/wdlhrg370gm42s7ggyhnvnb4xrzpls1x-expat-2.2.1/lib -lssl
> > /gnu/store/ldkwm8hwhknpx6651yjgc1231nh8234d-libevent-2.1.8/lib/
> libevent.so
> > -L/gnu/store/ks27x0mf95gir0cdgb9h573xbava6v1k-python-3.5.3/lib
> > -L/gnu/store/ks27x0mf95gir0cdgb9h573xbava6v1k-python-3.5.3/lib/python3.5
> > -L. -lpython3.5m -lcrypto -pthread -Wl,-rpath
> > -Wl,/gnu/store/ldkwm8hwhknpx6651yjgc1231nh8234d-libevent-2.1.8/lib
> > -Wl,-rpath
> > -Wl,/gnu/store/ldkwm8hwhknpx6651yjgc1231nh8234d-libevent-2.1.8/lib
> > -Wl,-rpath
> > -Wl,/gnu/store/m0m6bwzi8lx7kv8zbn3hjrim6flmgnf4-openssl-1.0.2l/lib
> > LD_PRELOAD=/tmp/nss_preload.so ./unittest
> > make: *** [Makefile:308: test] Killed
> > phase `check' failed after 18.3 seconds
> >
> > Requires further investigation.
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------------------------------
> >
> > java-eclipse-jetty-security@9.2.22 - log extract
> > [junit] Tests run: 22, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time
> > elapsed: 0.75 sec
> > [junit] HTTP/1.1 302 Found
> > [junit] Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 05:32:39 GMT
> > [junit] Location: https://wobble.com/ctx/data/info
> > [junit] Content-Length: 0
> > [junit] Server: Jetty(9.2.z-SNAPSHOT)
> > [junit]
> > [junit]
> >
> > BUILD FAILED
> > /tmp/guix-build-java-eclipse-jetty-security-9.2.22.drv-0/
> jetty.project-jetty-9.2.22.v20170606/jetty-security/build.xml:1:
> > Test org.eclipse.jetty.security.ConstraintTest failed
> >
> > Total time: 3 seconds
> > phase `check' failed after 4.0 seconds
> >
> > Requires further investigation.
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------------------------------------
> >
> > java-eclipse-jetty-security@9.4.6 - log extract
> > BUILD FAILED
> > /tmp/guix-build-java-eclipse-jetty-security-9.4.6.drv-0/
> jetty.project-jetty-9.4.6.v20170531/jetty-security/build.xml:1:
> > Test org.eclipse.jetty.security.ConstraintTest failed
> >
> > Total time: 12 seconds
> > phase `check' failed after 13.3 seconds
> >
> > Requires further investigation.
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > This is how far I could get by now.
> > What should we do with these?
> >
> > These are the latest hydra run results by the way, it might well be that
> > some of these is already fixed.
>
> We'll have to investigate them one by one, I guess. To reduce the risk
> of accidentally repeating work, I suggest that anyone who works on a
> package mentioned here should reply to this thread to let everyone know
> they are working on it. When I get enough time to start working on some
> of these, I'll do that.
>
> Meanwhile, on the core-updates branch, it seems that there are other
> existing problems.
>
> I tried again to build the "covering" of icedtea (i.e., the set of
> packages which, when built, are sufficient to rebuild all packages that
> might be broken by changing icedtea), and I found that none of the
> packages currently build against
> d6adba786cf2ab1b26ff083928b64262281ff106 (which was the tip of
> core-updates a few days ago). Failures were as follows:
>
> * kodi@18.0_alpha-6-f22d62d fails because the following fail:
> * protobuf-3.4.1
> * libvpx-1.6.1
> * icu4c-60.1
>
> * All other 38 packages in the "covering" for icedtea fail because the
> following fails:
> * icu4c-60.1
>
> So, on the core-updates branch at least, the appropriate first step
> seems like it would be to fix icu4c. Here's the error:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> g++ ... dayperiodrules.cpp
> g++ ... number_decimalquantity.cpp
> g++ ... number_decimfmtprops.cpp
> number_decimalquantity.cpp: In member function
> ‘icu_60::number::impl::DecimalQuantity&
> icu_60::number::impl::DecimalQuantity::setToDouble(double)’:
> number_decimalquantity.cpp:333:9: error: ‘_Generic’ is not a member of
> ‘std’
> if (std::signbit(n) != 0) {
> ^
> In file included from /gnu/store/nz2m4gdvgzcrkqa4xwv360iskh7syj
> 7i-gcc-5.5.0/include/c++/cmath:44:0,
> from number_decimalquantity.cpp:9:
> number_decimalquantity.cpp:333:14: error: expected primary-expression
> before ‘float’
> if (std::signbit(n) != 0) {
> ^
> number_decimalquantity.cpp:333:14: error: expected primary-expression
> before ‘default’
> if (std::signbit(n) != 0) {
> ^
> number_decimalquantity.cpp:333:14: error: expected primary-expression
> before ‘long’
> if (std::signbit(n) != 0) {
> ^
> number_decimalquantity.cpp:333:14: error: expected primary-expression
> before ‘:’ token
> if (std::signbit(n) != 0) {
> ^
> number_decimalquantity.cpp:337:9: error: ‘__builtin_isnan’ is not a
> member of ‘std’
> if (std::isnan(n) != 0) {
> ^
> number_decimalquantity.cpp:337:9: note: suggested alternative:
> <built-in>: note: ‘__builtin_isnan’
> number_decimalquantity.cpp:339:16: error: ‘__builtin_isfinite’ is not a
> member of ‘std’
> } else if (std::isfinite(n) == 0) {
> ^
> number_decimalquantity.cpp:339:16: note: suggested alternative:
> <built-in>: note: ‘__builtin_isfinite’
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> I am currently doing a git bisect to try and find out what caused this
> failure. I'll let you know once I know more.
>
> --
> Chris
>
