Hello, Gábor Boskovits <boskov...@gmail.com> skribis:
> Yesteday we had a discussion about that on irc. > Here it goes: > > > [15:15:16] <g_bor> hello guix! > [15:16:01] <g_bor> do we have a proposed way to build pyc files > reproducibly? > [15:16:50] <g_bor> I've read in the report, that we are not there yet, but > is someone working on it? > [15:17:58] <lfam> g_bor: This is the report you mention? < > https://bugs.gnu.org/22533> > [15:18:10] <lfam> I'm not sure if anyone has been working on it since the > last message > [15:20:26] * Guest74 has joined #guix > [15:23:05] <g_bor> thx, just what i was looking for. > [15:23:26] <lfam> It's possible that some work in this area is pending on > the 'core-updates' Git branch, but I'm not sure > [15:37:41] <mb[m]1> At this stage we might as well wait for this to land > upstream: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0552/ > > So, it seems, that we are waiting for this pep to land upstream. Cool, thanks for the notification. Now, I’d be in favor of incorporating a patch in the meantime, rather than wait for the PEP to materialize. I can’t find Debian’s patches in <https://alioth.debian.org/scm/loggerhead/pkg-python/python3-defaults-debian/files/head:/debian/>, but they probably have something. Ludo’.
