Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> skribis: > Ludovic Courtès <ludovic.cour...@inria.fr> writes: > >> Bonus: what would the tarball backend do with the entry point? Ignore it? > > It should end up as a script in the tarball IMO.
With an easily recognizable fixed name? Like /init or /run? > Maybe we want a more general feature here. For example, we had the > problem that /etc/environment is not actually sourced by default. Maybe > what we need is a way to start services that are then configured like > any other shepherd service…? Or is this too much? I think it could be useful, but it’s a special case of the more general notion of an “entry point”: a possible entry point could be ‘shepherd’, but it doesn’t have to. Ludo’.
