Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Arun Isaac <arunis...@systemreboot.net> writes: > >>> So far we have separated packages according to their purpose. There are >>> a few exceptions, such as python.scm, which would best be split up. If >>> possible I’d rather have JavaScript libraries in modules that indicate >>> what their purpose is. General purpose frameworks, on the other hand, >>> could very well fit in a javascript.scm. >> >> I think mathjax being a kind of library, should be put in a >> javascript.scm with a "javascript-" prefix. This is similar to the way >> we treat python libraries with a "python-" prefix, emacs >> packages/libraries with a "emacs-" prefix, etc. WDYT? > > Sounds good. I would prefer a shorter prefix, though, such as “js-”. > We use “cl-” for Common Lisp, and I’m glad I don’t need to type so much > :)
Ok, "js-" then! :-)
