Hi, Mathieu Othacehe <m.othac...@gmail.com> skribis:
> Thanks for taking care of it. > >> I could not reproduce the failure when building "by hand", but since >> `guix pull` is the primary method of updating Guix, I reverted this >> change for now: > > I guess it is because in (guix build pull) every single file is > builded, without take configure/makefile consigns into account. Yes, see build-aux/build-self.scm. > Except a horrible hack (an exception list in "build-guix"), I don't see > how to deal with it. Maybe this commit shall be put on a branch or wait > until guix switches to guile2.2. > > Ludo any thoughs ? I plan to update ‘guix pull’ for Guile 2.2 before the release: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2017-04/msg00515.html When it’s done, we could add Guile-Git as an input when 2.2 is used, and maybe add a special case for (guix git). Thoughts? Ludo’.